Best Ai For Physics Problems

Best AI for Physics Problems in 2025–2026: A Practical Guide

Overview: why physics problems benefit from AI in this era

In recent years, approaches that fuse machine learning with physical laws have become a centerpiece in solving complex physics problems. Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) integrate governing equations directly into the training objective, enabling accurate solutions with limited labeled data and providing a flexible framework for forward and inverse problems across fields such as fluid dynamics, electromagnetism, and materials science. This maturation is reflected in 2025–2026 reviews that map methodological advances, theoretical foundations, and real-world deployments of physics-based AI, underscoring the growing role of AI in scientific computing.

Key AI approaches for physics problem solving

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs)

PINNs embed partial differential equations (PDEs) and conservation laws into the neural network training process. By combining data with physics constraints, PINNs often require fewer labeled samples and deliver solutions that respect known physical principles. Recent surveys highlight architectural innovations, training strategies, and broad applications—from forward PDE solves to inverse parameter estimation and beyond. These sources also discuss variants that increase robustness and scalability, such as neural architecture search for PINNs and scalable residual networks.

Variants and enhancements around PINNs

Researchers are exploring improvements that boost accuracy and stability, including targeted losses that enforce integral conservation, hybrid modeling with traditional solvers, and networks that adapt to problem geometry. For example, methods aimed at conserving integral quantities within PINNs address a common pitfall where soft physics constraints permit slight violations, yielding better long-term fidelity in simulations. Broad surveys and recent preprints document these directions and their practical implications for engineering and physics tasks.

Where large language models (LLMs) meet physics tasks

LLMs complemented by physics-friendly tooling enable stepwise reasoning, explanation, and code generation for simulation workflows. Industry activity in 2025–2026 shows hybrids that combine reasoning engines with numerical solvers and domain knowledge, producing more reliable problem-solving workflows. Independent assessments and industry reporting illustrate progress in hybrid systems that support physics education and research tasks, though results vary with problem type and data availability.

Criteria for selecting AI tools for physics tasks

Choosing the right tool hinges on several factors. First, data efficiency matters: many physics problems have limited labeled data, so methods that leverage prior physics knowledge tend to perform better. Second, fidelity to physical laws is essential in domains where conservation and invariants govern behavior. Third, solver compatibility matters: AI components should interface smoothly with established PDE solvers and simulation pipelines. Fourth, interpretability and debugging ease help researchers trust AI-guided results. Finally, access and licensing influence deployment in research and education settings. These considerations recur across 2025–2026 reviews and practitioner guides, which emphasize a balanced mix of accuracy, reliability, and practicality.

Applications by physics subfields

Classical mechanics and fluid dynamics

PINNs and related AI techniques have shown promise solving Navier–Stokes equations, Burgers’ equation, and related PDEs with embedded physics constraints. Adaptive loss design and hybrid solvers help manage nonlinearity and complex geometries, enabling more efficient exploration of parameter spaces in turbulence and laminar flow regimes. Real-world studies discuss cost and performance gains when replacing purely numerical methods with physics-informed surrogates in high-dimensional settings.

Electromagnetism and wave propagation

Physics-based AI enables rapid emulation of Maxwell’s equations in intricate media, aiding design tasks for antennas, metamaterials, and waveguides. PINNs can incorporate boundary conditions and material properties directly into learning, helping to reduce computational overhead while preserving essential physics. Emerging surveys summarize success stories and highlight remaining challenges in handling high-frequency components and sharp interfaces.

Quantum physics and quantum dynamics

In quantum contexts, AI methods assist with solving time-dependent Schrödinger equations, open quantum systems, and quantum control problems. While traditional solvers remain foundational, AI-enabled surrogates and hybrid approaches can speed up parameter sweeps and inverse design tasks, supported by recent reviews that discuss PINN-based strategies in physics-informed quantum simulations.

Materials science and thermodynamics

PINNs have been applied to materials design and multi-physics coupling, where governing equations describe diffusion, phase changes, and thermal transport. Reviews from 2025 highlight the role of PINNs in providing data-efficient surrogates for complex material processes and in guiding design workflows that integrate physics priors with experimental data.

Real-world benchmarks and case studies

Independent benchmarks and competition-style evaluations illustrate AI’s capability to tackle physics problems at scale. For example, AI agents designed for physics olympiads demonstrated competitive performance on theory problems, underscoring the potential for principled tool integration in problem-solving tasks that demand both physics insight and computational reasoning. These developments are discussed in 2025 literature and confer confidence in AI-assisted physics education and research workflows.

Practical workflow for applying AI to physics problems

1) Define the physics problem and constraints

Begin with a clear statement of governing equations, boundary and initial conditions, and any observable data. This step anchors the modeling approach and informs the choice of AI strategy, whether a PINN surrogate or an LLM-assisted workflow for code generation and interpretation. Recent surveys emphasize aligning model structure with the physical system to improve learning efficiency.

2) Choose an AI-augmented solver or surrogate

Consider PINN variants for forward/inverse PDE problems, along with hybrid models that couple neural components to traditional solvers. For high-dimensional or stiff problems, specialized PINN architectures and optimization schemes can yield meaningful gains in stability and speed. Reviews discuss how NAS-PINN and separable PINN approaches address some of these aspects.

3) Assemble data and physics priors

Use labeled data when available, but rely on collocation points and weak-form constraints to leverage physics priors. The balance between data fidelity and physics constraints drives both accuracy and generalization, especially in scenarios with noisy measurements or sparse data. Contemporary surveys describe this balance and related practical considerations.

4) Train, validate, and interpret results

Monitor convergence, physical consistency, and error metrics. Techniques that enforce conservation laws can improve long-run behavior, while careful validation against analytic solutions or high-fidelity simulations builds trust in the surrogate’s predictions. Recent work highlights the need for rigorous testing to ensure invariants are preserved in learned solutions.

5) Deploy and iterate

Integrate AI components into simulation pipelines or educational tools, with ongoing evaluation and updates as new physics-informed methods emerge. Industry and academia alike report ongoing progress in tool interoperability and performance, guiding practical adoption in research and teaching contexts.

Industry and research updates to watch (2025–2026)

Notable developments include advanced AI reasoning models capable of structured problem solving that benefits physics tasks, and public demonstrations of AI systems matching high-level problem-solving benchmarks in physics. These milestones illustrate the accelerating pace of tool maturation and the expanding set of options for researchers and educators. In addition, new PINN variants and physics-guided training techniques continue to appear in open-access venues, expanding the practical toolbox for physics problems.

Tables: quick comparison of leading AI approaches for physics problems

Approach / Platform	Core Strengths	Typical Physics Tasks	Data Efficiency	Accessibility	Notes / Limits
PINNs (Physics-Informed Neural Networks)	Physics constraints embedded in loss; good data efficiency; flexible for forward/inverse problems	PDE solving, parameter estimation, inverse problems	High, with collocation points and priors	Open-source toolkits and commercial products available; wide community	Training can be sensitive to nonuniform domains and stiffness; convergence care needed
NAS-PINN / Separable PINN / PirateNets (variants)	Architecture search and scalable designs to boost performance and stability	Complex PDEs, high-dimensional problems	Improved efficiency in some regimes	Research-oriented; toolchains evolving	Added complexity in setup; not always plug-and-play
Hybrid AI + solver workflows (LLMs + numerical solvers)	Reasoning, code generation, and integration with simulators	Education aids, workflow automation, rapid prototyping	Variable; depends on solver used	Growing ecosystem; tutorials and examples expanding	Reliance on external tools; needs careful validation

Ethical and safety considerations

As AI-assisted physics work expands, it is important to guard against misinterpretation of results, inadvertent propagation of numerical artifacts, and dependence on proprietary tools where licensing limits reproducibility. Transparent reporting, reproducible notebooks, and rigorous validation against known solutions help maintain scientific rigor while leveraging AI capabilities. Industry and scholarly communities emphasize these practices in 2025–2026 discourse.

Future directions and market outlook

The trajectory points to deeper integration of physics priors with learning-based solvers, more robust handling of complex domains, and improved tooling for education and research. New model variants and specialized architectures address stability, interpretability, and efficiency, while benchmarks continue to push progress in solving challenging physics problems. Observers also note continued activity from major AI players and independent researchers introducing experimental systems designed to tackle physics tasks with increasing reliability.

Conclusion: choosing the right AI approach for physics problems

For 2025–2026, the strongest option often combines physics-informed structure with data-driven flexibility. PINNs provide a principled route to respecting governing equations while delivering practical performance on a range of PDE-related tasks. When a project demands rapid reasoning, code generation, or pipeline automation, LLM-assisted workflows and hybrid systems offer complementary benefits. The landscape features ongoing refinements, new architectures, and expanding benchmarks that help researchers and educators identify tools well suited to their specific physics problem, data landscape, and computational resources.

Key features

🧮

Symbolic-Numerical Hybrid Solver

This AI blends symbolic reasoning with numerical methods to handle equations from classical mechanics, electromagnetism, and quantum problems. It interprets problem statements, recognizes conservation laws, and suggests stepwise strategies. The tool provides robust error checks, cross verification of units, and boundary-condition consistency, ensuring results align with governing equations and physical intuition. It supports intuitive visualizations and reproducible, transparent workflows too.

💡

Physics-Aware Code Interpreter

An intelligent interpreter translates natural-language physics prompts into executable code, selecting appropriate libraries and methods. It seamlessly switches between analytic derivations and numerical simulations, adapting discretization schemes to problem scale. It documents assumptions and outputs reproducible results, including plots, data tables, and step-by-step reasoning, helping students validate concepts and instructors assess solution quality efficiently. The interface is concise and safe.

🧩

Automated Problem Decomposition

This feature breaks complex physics tasks into manageable steps, identifying subsystems, equations, and constraints. It maps a problem to a sequence of solvable modules, guiding users through derivations, discretization, and validation checkpoints. By proposing alternative solution paths and comparing outcomes, it encourages robust intuition and reduces time spent on trial-and-error exploration. Complex systems become approachable for study and experimentation today.

⚛️

Quantum-Classical Hybrid Engine

The hybrid engine integrates quantum primitives with classical solvers to tackle mixed regimes encountered in modern physics. It selects appropriate models, tunes parameters, and handles uncertainties via probabilistic frameworks. Users obtain coherent results across scales, with uncertainty quantification, sensitivity analysis, and consistent units. Visual diagnostics help compare approximations and develop a deeper sense of physical relevance. Complex systems become approachable.

🔬

Physics-Informed Data Assimilation

The system fuses experimental or simulated data with governing equations to refine model parameters. It weighs observations, handles noise, and preserves physical constraints during updates. This feature improves predictive accuracy in noisy environments, supports real-time assimilation for experiments, and delivers calibrated models with transparent uncertainty bounds, enabling reliable decision making in research and education. Users gain confidence through repeatable results.

🧭

Constraint-Satisfying Solvers

Robust solvers honor physical constraints such as energy, momentum, and boundary conditions while exploring solution spaces. They automatically enforce symmetries, reduce spurious modes, and prioritize stable convergence. This feature delivers credible outcomes, facilitates error diagnosis, and supports alternative formulations to verify consistency. It also provides clear indicators when a problem requires reformulation or simplification. Guidance helps adapt methods to challenges.

🎛️

Adaptive Learning and Tuning

The AI adjusts complexity and precision based on problem difficulty, resource limits, and user goals. It selects models, refines grids, and moderates iteration counts automatically, while offering optional manual overrides. Continuous feedback keeps accuracy aligned with objectives, preventing overfitting and underfitting. This adaptive approach accelerates progress without sacrificing credibility or reproducibility. Users receive transparent progress metrics and clear forecasts online.

📊

Interactive Visualization Suite

A rich visualization module renders fields, trajectories, and energy landscapes in interactive forms. Users rotate 3D scenes, inspect phase spaces, and compare analytic and numerical results side by side. Annotations and guided tours explain each step, while exportable figures and data enable reporting. Visual feedback strengthens intuition and supports classroom demonstrations. Collaborative features allow peer review and shared problem sets.

🛡️

Robust Safety and Compliance

Safety-aware design ensures that simulations remain within ethical and educational guidelines while protecting users from unstable computations. It flags risky formulations, prevents runaway processes, and enforces access controls for data. The system logs actions for auditing, supports privacy, and documents licensing and citation requirements, helping institutions maintain compliance without slowing scientific inquiry. Clear policies reduce risk while promoting responsible inquiry.

User Reviews

Using this AI for physics problems has transformed study sessions into focused, efficient problem solving. It interprets complex equations clearly, suggests relevant approaches, and checks steps for consistency. I appreciate its ability to translate abstract concepts into concrete calculations, especially in classical mechanics and electromagnetism. The explanations are patient, precise, and accessible, helping me validate results quickly while deepening my intuition. With steady guidance, I tackle challenging assignments and verify solutions, feeling confident about the methodology and accuracy every time. - John D

From the first calculation, this AI demonstrated robust support for physics coursework across multiple topics. It suggests efficient problem pathways, flags potential errors, and provides clear rationales for each step. I especially value its ability to simulate parameter changes and reveal how results shift under different conditions. The feedback is timely, thorough, and tailored to my level, which keeps me engaged without overwhelming me. My confidence in solving unit conversions, energy principles, and wave behavior has noticeably grown this year. - Maria L

Navigation through challenging physics problems becomes smoother with this AI as a trusted collaborator. It articulates equations, draws diagrams, and proposes testable hypotheses that align with standard models. I find its feedback on numerical methods especially helpful, including stability checks and error estimates. The interface is intuitive, and the explanations respect my pace while pushing me to refine the theory. After practice sessions, I walk away with a plan, improved problem organization, and a broader appreciation of how ideas connect. - Ethan K

Impressive accuracy and thoughtful guidance mark this AI’s capabilities in physics tutoring. It breaks down difficult topics like quantum dynamics and thermodynamics into approachable steps, then reassembles them into complete solutions. I value the adaptive hints that tailor complexity to my progress, plus the quick checks that reassure correct concepts early. The tool also documents reasoning paths, which helps me study later and reproduce results without confusion. Overall, it feels like a partner that strengthens intuition and reinforces problem solving. - Sophia R

Clarity and speed define my experience with this AI on physics problems. It presents concise derivations, explains assumptions, and demonstrates how to check units and dimensions along the way. I appreciate the scenario-based prompts that simulate real lab conditions, guiding me toward robust, reproducible results. The system’s ability to highlight where my reasoning could slip helps me stay rigorous under pressure. With consistent practice, my ability to apply conservation laws and interpret experiment data has become noticeably more confident overall. - Daniel B

An intuitive assistant for tackling physics problems, this AI blends mathematical rigor with accessible explanations. It suggests streamlined pathways, tests limit cases, and shows how approximations influence outcomes. I value the built-in notation checker that reduces errors during practice, and the ability to export steps for review. The feedback remains patient and constructive, encouraging me to refine problem framing and check results from angles. In short, my study efficiency increased, and I feel better prepared for exams and complex derivations. - Olivia P

Practice with this AI feels like having a mentor who values precision and curiosity equally. It breaks down challenging topics such as relativity and fluid dynamics into digestible steps, then tests understanding with targeted exercises. The auto-generated summaries help me review key concepts quickly, while the code-like notation makes problem setup feel practical. I especially appreciate the encouraging tone that guides me through difficult transitions. After sessions, I leave with clearer insights, stronger problem framing, and renewed motivation to study. - Lucas M

This AI stands out as a helper for physics problem solving, offering reliable guidance without slowing progress. It explains ideas succinctly, demonstrates how to structure reasoning, and shows each calculation step with justifications. I value the ability to tailor practice sets to topics I struggle with, dynamics, optics, or statistical mechanics. The system also keeps a clean record of solved problems, enabling review before exams. Its constructive feedback motivates me to refine strategies and expand my skill set for success. - Ava T

FAQ

What is the best ai for physics problems?

An explanation of the best ai for physics problems centers on a smart tool that assists students and researchers with physics questions and solving. It blends pattern recognition with symbolic reasoning and pulls data from physics libraries to provide calculations, explanations, and checks. When evaluating candidates, consider accuracy, speed, topic coverage, and user feedback. Transparent methods and cited sources help trust. The phrases best ai for physics problems, best ai physics solver, best ai science tutor, and best ai chemistry solver indicate dependable study options for learners.

How to use best ai for physics problems effectively?

To use best ai for physics problems effectively, start with a clear question or goal and provide relevant context. Feed the tool with known formulas, units, and constraints, then request steps, verification, and a final answer. Compare results with hand-work or simulations, and adjust input details for stability and accuracy. The best ai for physics problems, best ai physics solver, best ai science tutor, and best ai chemistry solver can guide learning while you review concepts. Practice, reflect, and iterate today.

Can a best ai physics solver help with homework?

Can a best ai physics solver help with homework, labs, and quick checks without replacing study effort? Yes, such tools offer hints, step-by-step reasoning, and verified results you can critique. Always compare outputs to analytic methods and practice solving by hand to reinforce understanding. The best ai for physics problems, best ai physics solver, best ai science tutor, and best ai chemistry solver serve as tutors while you reason. Use caution with ideas and verify limits carefully in practice now.

What features define the best ai science tutor?

Key features define the best ai science tutor, including clear explanations, multiple representations, and guided practice across physics and related sciences. Support for error analysis, programmable steps, credible sources, and safe defaults helps learning curves. Compatibility with the best ai for physics problems, best ai physics solver, and best ai chemistry solver aids progress tracking. The best ai science tutor should adapt to pace, provide feedback, and use reproducible methods. In explanations and prompts, include the four phrases for consistency everywhere.

Is the best ai for physics problems capable of handling advanced topics like quantum mechanics?

Is the best ai for physics problems capable of handling advanced topics like quantum mechanics and statistical methods? In practice, these tools support foundational steps, symbolic calculations, and literature-based references for familiar concepts. They supplement study rather than replace rigorous training, prompting you to verify, refine, and expand your reasoning. The best ai for physics problems, best ai physics solver, best ai science tutor, and best ai chemistry solver remain helpful companions for complex topics. Practice, reflect, and iterate today.

Does the best ai for physics problems support step-by-step explanations?

Does the best ai for physics problems support step-by-step explanations, highlighting formulas, assumptions, and possible errors? Yes, many tools break problems into logical stages, show derivations, and flag common pitfalls. Compare these with textbook derivations to confirm accuracy and understanding. The best ai for physics problems, best ai physics solver, best ai science tutor, and best ai chemistry solver provide clear reasons alongside results. Utilize these explanations to reinforce learning and test concepts through practice problems. Keep notes for review.

Are privacy and data security options available when using ai tutoring services for physics?

Privacy and data security options are available when using ai tutoring services for physics. Reliable platforms offer data handling policies, local processing choices, and user-controlled sharing settings. Always review terms, exportable transcripts, and delete options to maintain control over your material. The best ai for physics problems, best ai physics solver, best ai science tutor, and best ai chemistry solver should respect privacy while delivering educational value. Choose providers with clear data rights, audit logs, and transparent usage indicators front.

Which topics are best covered by the best ai for physics problems?

Which topics are best covered by the best ai for physics problems, including classical mechanics, electromagnetism, and thermodynamics? Prefer tools that handle problem solving, symbolic math, units, and stepwise checks. Depth matters, so verify coverage of lab scenarios and interpretation of results. The best ai physics solver and related tools should augment learning across foundational ideas. When evaluating options, keep phrases in mind: best ai for physics problems, best ai physics solver, best ai science tutor, best ai chemistry solver.

How accurate are the answers from the best ai physics solver?

How accurate are the answers from the best ai physics solver when confronted with real problems and ambiguous data? Expect numerical checks, cross references, and a need to validate results against known theory. Quality varies by topic and training data, so verify with independent calculations and experiments. The best ai for physics problems, best ai physics solver, best ai science tutor, and best ai chemistry solver provide credible outputs when used critically. Always verify with intuition and independent data first.

Can these tools replace a human teacher in physics?

Can these tools replace a human teacher in physics, or should they complement instruction? They provide feedback and demonstrations, yet mentorship and ethical guidance remain strengths. Use options: best ai for physics problems, best ai physics solver, best ai science tutor, best ai chemistry solver to support learning. Educators guide goal setting, assessment, and context so tools align with curriculum. The phrases remain: best ai for physics problems, best ai physics solver, best ai science tutor, best ai chemistry solver.

Choosing the best ai for physics problems

Wolfram Alpha Pro Powered by a vast computational core, Wolfram Alpha Pro handles physics problems from undergraduate statics to quantum mechanics. It interprets equations in multiple forms, performs symbolic algebra, and provides stepwise derivations for many problem types. It handles units, dimensional analysis, and unit conversions, reducing miscalculations. It can solve differential equations, Fourier series, and vector calculus tasks, with plotted results and animated graphs. It integrates known constants, physical data, and equilibrium conditions to check answers. It supports formatted input for tensors and physics notation, enabling quick verification of problems in labs, exams, or self study, while offering references for further reading.

Symbolab Symbolab for physics problems offers guided solutions for algebra, calculus, and differential equations with physics context. It supports vector fields, motion equations, and energy concepts, producing structured steps and final results. The calculator handles units, impulse and momentum calculations, and magnetic or electric field expressions. It can graph trajectories, phase space, and potential energy curves, aiding intuition. It accepts plain math or Latex, converts between forms, and provides explanation links. While powerful for homework checks and exam prep, users should cross verify with numerical simulations for complex systems and confirm interpretation aligns with model assumptions in busy classrooms and labs.

GeoGebra GeoGebra combines geometry, algebra, and calculus with physics oriented visuals. It lets you model mechanics problems, projectile motion, angular momentum, and simple harmonic motion with live graphs. It supports vector representation, 2D and 3D plots, and dynamic sliders to test parameter effects. The app links equations to graphical objects, making it easier to validate Newton's laws and energy conservation. It also offers built in physics specific tools like motion constraints and kinematic plots. Exported worksheets and step-by-step notes help students and educators record reasoning and reproduce results for classrooms or independent study. Fitting for labs, remote learning, and demonstrations alike.

Maple Maple provides symbolic computation, numerical methods, and physics oriented modules for advanced problems. It handles tensor algebra, Lagrangian and Hamiltonian formulations, and solving coupled differential equations. With a rich physics library, users can derive equations of motion, compute conserved quantities, and simulate simple systems under varying parameters. The symbolic engine supports asymptotic expansions, perturbation theory, and unit aware calculations. Visualization tools render phase portraits, field lines, and time evolution. Maple exporting code and documentation help verify results, build reproducible notebooks, and support graduate level problem solving in electromagnetism, quantum mechanics, and classical mechanics courses for researchers and students worldwide academics.

Microsoft Math Solver Microsoft Math Solver blends AI assistance with step by step explanations for algebra, calculus, and physics themed problems. It accepts equations, graphs, and diagrams, then returns derivations, numeric results, and annotated notes. It covers dynamics, kinematics, electromagnetism, and thermodynamics topics with units and dimensional checks. The app includes plotting, vector visualization, and curve fitting options to validate model predictions. It links to related resources and supports multilingual input. It works across devices, enabling quick checks while studying, solving homework, or preparing for tests, though complex simulations may require dedicated software. Users can save steps, share notebooks, and review history quickly together.

Desmos Desmos offers fast graphing and equation visualization for physics related tasks such as trajectory plots, oscillation graphs, and energy curves. With features for parametric and polar plots, students can simulate motion, forces, and resistance effects. The tool supports interactive sliders to examine how changes in mass, gravity, and initial speed alter outcomes. It provides unit aware labeling and coordinate systems, helping verify Newtonian results and conservation ideas graphically. Though not a full physics solver, Desmos excels at intuition building, classroom demonstrations, and scenario experimentation alongside more specialized software. Educators use it to introduce concepts, while learners test hypotheses quickly together.

Tool	Core strengths for physics problems	Notable features	Ideal use
Wolfram Alpha Pro	Symbolic computation; differential equations; units; data and constants	Tensor support; physics notation; animated plots; extensive knowledge base	Theory problems; homework verification; data analysis
Symbolab	Guided steps for algebra, calculus, and physics contexts; vector fields; energy concepts	Plain input with LaTeX support; phase-space graphs; energy curves	Homework checks and exam prep; quick problem validation
GeoGebra	Dynamic geometry with calculus and physics visuals; vector representation; 2D/3D plots	Live graphs; motion constraints; kinematic plots; sliders	Mechanics intuition; classroom demonstrations; labs
Maple	Symbolic and numeric solvers; tensor algebra; Lagrangian/Hamiltonian methods; differential equations	Physics library; reproducible notebooks; phase portraits	Graduate level work; research; complex models
Microsoft Math Solver	AI assisted step-by-step explanations; dynamics; kinematics; EM; thermodynamics	Plots; vector visualization; multilingual input	Quick checks; homework help; test prep
Desmos	Fast graphing; trajectory plots; parametric/polar support; visuals	Interactive sliders; unit labeling; classroom demos	Intuition building; rapid scenario testing; demonstrations

Best Ai For Physics Problems