Create websites with Dora AI Website Generator

Text to Website

Dora's text-to-site engine translates a single natural-language prompt into a complete, responsive website ready for refinement. It analyzes intent, tone, and audience to produce structured pages with headings, CTAs, forms, and imagery placed for clarity and conversion. After generation, users can edit copy, switch assets, and adjust layout while keeping design coherence. This workflow reduces manual layout work and accelerates prototype-to-live cycles, letting creators produce production-ready sites with minimal setup and rapid iterative control. Immediate publishing or export options included.

Template-free Custom Sites

Dora generates original site structures rather than selecting from prebuilt templates, so every page is tailored directly to the prompt. Content, imagery, and components are composed to match the requested aesthetic and function, avoiding stocky, repetitive results. Designers retain control through a visual editor that supports selective overrides, preserving AI composition while allowing handcrafted adjustments. This approach produces distinctive, on-brand experiences at scale and reduces the time spent shoehorning content into generic layouts, improving uniqueness and user engagement across projects.

Brand Identity Matching

Dora ingests brand signals—logos, color palettes, tone guidelines, and sample copy—to generate sites that reflect established identity. The system maps brand attributes to typography choices, image styles, and spacing rules so pages feel cohesive across sections and devices. Users may upload assets or paste brand guidelines, then let the generator produce multiple variations that maintain consistency while offering diversity. Built-in controls let teams fine-tune color, font scale, and voice for polished results suited to marketing, portfolios, and corporate sites.

AI Copy and Custom Imagery

Dora generates original copy and images tailored to each page, producing headlines, body text, meta descriptions, and visual assets aligned with the site's tone. Image synthesis uses composition rules that place subjects, backgrounds, and UI elements for clarity and consistency. Copy can be edited inline or regenerated with alternate tones for A/B testing. SEO-friendly meta suggestions and accessible alt text are offered automatically, reducing manual polishing. Teams save time by generating ready-to-publish content that matches design intent and conversion goals.

Responsive Intelligent Layouts

Dora coordinates text, images, and interactive elements within responsive layouts that adapt to screen sizes and content length. The engine applies spacing systems, visual hierarchy, and accessibility constraints so components align and read well on mobile, tablet, and desktop. It selects grid structures, column counts, and breakpoints to preserve visual balance while prioritizing task flows such as signups and purchases. Editors can nudge arrangements or lock components to freeze behavior, offering precise control alongside automated composition for consistent production quality.

Figma Integration & Import

Dora provides a Figma plugin and import tools that translate design files into editable, AI-enhanced web pages. Designers can author in Figma, then transfer frames, components, and styles into Dora which maps tokens to web-safe CSS, preserving layout intent while enabling content generation. This workflow reduces handoff friction and accelerates iteration between design and development. Teams can maintain a single source of truth, export back to Figma, and combine crafted layouts with AI-driven copy and imagery for faster production cycles.

Credits, Billing, and Publishing

New users receive a starter balance of free credits to experiment with site generation before paying. Credit consumption corresponds to generation complexity and additional features; teams can top up credits or subscribe for recurring allotments. Dora supports unlimited project creation and free publishing under dora.run domains, making prototyping inexpensive. Administrative dashboards track usage, and role-based access helps control spending across team members. Transparent limits and flexible purchase options allow organizations to scale AI-generated workflows without surprise charges or hidden fees.

Roadmap and Future Capabilities

Dora maintains an roadmap that outlines forthcoming capabilities like 3D asset generation and interactive animations. The team labels features as shipped, in beta, or planned, giving users a clear view of development priorities and timing. Community feedback channels, including Discord and documentation, collect requests and bug reports to shape sprints. Beta releases let power users test early capabilities while documentation and example projects demonstrate implementation patterns. This transparent cadence helps teams plan integration timelines and anticipate new tools before rollout.

mouad zarrouki Trustpilot 'Dora.run – Locked-in, Limited, and No Refunds': mouad reported being unable to export site files, lack of refunds after cancellation, and poor Figma import support. They called the editor clunky, final pages under-optimized, and billing persistent despite proof of cancellation. The user advised freelancers and agencies to avoid platform lock-in and warned that migration to standard CMS is effectively impossible, and recommended building elsewhere with export options.

paola m.FR Trustpilot 'bought the month membership': paola said the monthly plan disappointed, calling the AI outdated compared to newer tools. They described the subscription UI as confusing and wrote that canceling was difficult, claiming payments continued until they used a bank chargeback. The user urged caution for short-term trials and criticized unclear billing and poor account controls that risk ongoing charges for casual users and encouraged full refund policies.

Anonymous (Slashdot) 'Difficult to Use and Terrible Customer Support': the reviewer reported severe friction after importing Figma designs, saying edits were nearly impossible and the visual editor broke layouts. They accused support of ignoring messages and of continued billing after cancellation, despite providing proof. The poster advised avoiding Dora for client projects, highlighting the time lost fixing broken imports and the lack of effective dispute resolution from the company altogether.

reddit user (r/Wordpress) thread 'Some one who know how to export a website compressed from Dora ai?': the poster said their client demanded WordPress and reported inability to find an export option. They described attempts to locate settings or export buttons and concluded that migrating required rebuilding the site manually. The commenter warned designers that Dora lacks a straightforward WordPress path and that reconstruction will consume significant time and effort.

reddit user (r/Shopify) thread 'Need help with photo animation': the poster reported creating an animation in Dora.run but found Shopify integration limited and Dora lacked required animation features beyond keyframed motions. They worried about paying for two services and judged Dora unsuitable for e-commerce workflows needing built-in commerce tools. The user asked for custom code alternatives and suggested that complex interactions from Dora may demand developer workarounds and extra expense.

Savvy Tech Talker (blog) 'Can I Download a Dora AI Website?': the author reported that Dora AI currently prevents downloading raw HTML, CSS, or JavaScript, forcing users to publish only on Dora hosting or point a custom domain. They noted this limitation frustrates designers who want backups or migration. The post experimented with cloning workarounds and concluded that extracting usable code remains impractical without manual reconstruction and significant developer time.

rizwan (NavThemes) 'How to Export Your Dora.ai Website: A Simple Guide': rizwan offered an export walkthrough but warned that advanced features like animations and AI integrations may not survive export. The article advised testing exported files for missing assets and browser quirks and recommended manual edits post‑export. The author cautioned that some Dora widgets require extra coding after export and suggested hosting choices while reminding readers to check plan export permissions.

Toksta (analysis) 'Dora AI Review 2025 - Reddit Sentiment, Alternatives & More': Toksta summarized community threads and highlighted recurring complaints about poor SEO focus, limited export and compatibility options, and occasional low‑quality AI imagery described as creepy. The analysis pointed to performance issues and constrained customization, flagging Dora as unsuitable for SEO‑heavy or developer‑centric projects. The author recommended caution for businesses needing ownership of code and long‑term portability and control.

Scamminder (article) 'is dora.run legitimate or a scam?': the report flagged mixed signals despite platform features, noting hidden WHOIS data, recent domain age, and variable trust scores. The author advised exercising caution, citing limited social proof and spotty review counts. Scamminder suggested verifying business contact details and reading community reports, warning that scarce independent endorsements raise questions for users who plan paid commitments or migration dependent workflows and research alternatives.

The AI Reports (article) 'Dora: No-Code 3D Web Design Platform': the writeup praised free entry options but highlighted user dissatisfaction when AI credits ended and paid tiers began. It noted perceived high costs for continued AI generation, causing frustration among users who expected sustained free capabilities. The article recommended users budget for credits and evaluate TCO, warning that the free tier can quickly become insufficient for sustained production use cases.