Create websites with Mozilla AI Website Generator

Instant Site Generation

Soloist creates a functional website from a handful of inputs, turning concept notes into structured pages, suggested images, and starter copy so users spend time refining tone and visuals rather than wiring layout elements. The system proposes section order, populates navigation, and applies a cohesive theme derived from the provided prompts, letting founders and creators move quickly from idea to public page while retaining full control over edits and publishing decisions.

Device Previews and Responsive Rendering

The editor shows how pages render across phones, tablets, and desktops, helping users spot spacing, typography, and navigation differences before launch. Automatic media scaling and adjustable breakpoints adapt images and text to varied viewports, while live preview toggles accelerate visual checks during edits. Designers can iterate with confidence because the builder highlights where adjustments are needed for legibility and interaction, reducing post-launch fixes and improving the visitor experience across device types.

Custom Domain and Hosting Options

Soloist supports custom domain connection and handles hosting so creators can publish quickly without separate infrastructure steps. Users may point an existing domain or register a new name, and the platform manages DNS basics and SSL provisioning to keep pages secure. Built-in hosting reduces configuration overhead and shortens the path from design to live site, making it practical for small businesses, portfolios, and side projects to present a polished web presence with minimal technical setup.

Collaborative Editing and Role Management

The platform allows team members to join as editors, enabling collaborative content creation and design review without sharing account credentials. Invite-based access supports shared workflows where contributors add copy, upload media, and adjust layout elements while owners control publication rights. This model helps small teams coordinate marketing assets, client feedback, and content calendars inside a single environment, streamlining handoffs between content creators, designers, and site administrators for smoother updates and consistent brand presentation.

Built-in SEO and Analytics

Default SEO keywords and metadata are suggested during site composition to help search visibility from the start, and users can connect Google Analytics for traffic insights. The system recommends headings, meta descriptions, and simple optimizations to improve indexability while keeping the interface approachable for nontechnical owners. Analytics connectivity provides pageview and referral data that supports content decisions and marketing adjustments, helping site maintainers monitor performance and refine messaging based on real visitor behavior.

Media Management and Galleries

Image galleries and curated media sections let creators display portfolios, products, or project work with attractive layouts and lightbox viewing. The builder offers initial image curation and sizing so visuals present well without manual optimization, and users can swap assets or reorder galleries with drag controls. Video embedding and hero imagery options support dynamic front pages while automated scaling and lazy loading help balance visual impact with load performance for visitors on slower connections.

E-commerce and Booking Features

Soloist includes commerce-facing tools such as product galleries, checkout support, and integrations for booking calendars so service providers and sellers can transact via their site. Inventory and payment options are presented through simple controls that let merchants list items or services without building complex backend systems. For appointment-based businesses, calendar links and booking widgets can be connected to streamline client scheduling, reducing administrative friction and converting visits into confirmed engagements.

Third-party Integrations and Extensible Add-ons

A roadmap and support for external services allow sites to connect tools like analytics, comment systems, forms, and payment providers, expanding functionality without custom code. Planned and available add-ons include form builders, review imports, multilingual modules, and calendar connectors that plug into common workflows. These integrations help creators add features as needs grow, enabling marketing, engagement, and commerce capabilities to be layered onto the core site while keeping the authoring interface approachable.

MESI-AD on Reddit (r/firefox) posted in the thread “Mozilla, Why?” expressing that Mozilla’s pivot to AI and the new Terms of Use betrayed long-standing privacy promises, undermining user trust. The commenter urged readers to toggle the ‘Tell websites not to sell or share my data’ setting and recommended LibreWolf as an alternative, arguing that Firefox’s privacy identity has been compromised by choices favoring commercial flexibility over clear protections and transparency.

MrAlex94 on Hacker News posted in 'A Comment on Mozilla's Policy Changes' warning that the updated Terms introduced licensing language that muddied Mozilla’s privacy stance, listing uses including AI chatbots and advertising. The poster argued that vague terminology and references to an Acceptable Use Policy risk extending control over Firefox, urged scrutiny of the Privacy Notice, and said users should demand clearer limits on data processing before accepting new terms.

eevee filed issue #9208 on GitHub (mdn/yari) titled 'MDN can now automatically lie to people seeking technical information', reporting that MDN’s 'ai explain' button produced confidently wrong CSS descriptions and warning that unreviewed LLM output undermines trust in documentation. The reporter demanded a human-review process or removal of auto-generated text, noting that cached, uneditable responses make corrections difficult and that technical references need accountable, reviewable sources rather than generative snippets.

Andi McClure was quoted in a The Register article titled 'Mozilla Developer Network adds AI Help... but it doesn't', criticizing MDN’s AI Help for injecting plausible but incorrect explanations into technical pages and saying the feature corrupted MDN’s reliability. The reporter noted community anger, with maintainers and contributors raising alarms about deployment without discussion; the article framed the controversy as trust issue between developers and Mozilla’s editorial stewardship of documentation.

Max Peckhart on Mozilla Support Forum posted in 'Youtube comments are gone' reporting that YouTube pages stopped loading correctly in Firefox, detailing long load times, missing menus, and playback failures despite disabling extensions and reinstalling. The user listed troubleshooting steps, seeking community help, arguing that regressions of core site compatibility harm browsing and called for Mozilla to prioritize compatibility fixes over experimental features that do not address user-facing bugs immediately.

gortok commented on Hacker News thread 'A Comment on Mozilla's Policy Changes' asserting Mozilla’s clarification worsened matters by exposing a Privacy Notice listing uses such as AI chatbots, ads, and review tools. The comment claimed those entries signal intent to leverage input data for commercial purposes, urged skeptical scrutiny, and recommended the community insist on explicit narrow legal language for licensing clauses in Firefox Terms and demand enforceable user protections.

jdoe2025 on Hacker News in 'A Comment on Mozilla's Policy Changes' criticized Mozilla’s Acceptable Use Policy references inside the Firefox Terms, calling the approach censorship-prone and arguing that users, not vendors, should control content choices. The commenter framed recent changes as driven by fear, warned about growing restrictions, and urged Mozilla to avoid policy moves that restrict speech or push users toward forks and alternatives with embedded enforcement powers.

NOYB filed a privacy complaint alleging that Firefox’s 'attribution that preserves privacy' function effectively tracked users without explicit consent and was enabled by default. NOYB argued Mozilla must inform users, seek explicit consent, and remove illegally processed data, framing the issue as a legal and transparency failure rather than a mere documentation change, and urging regulatory review plus stronger opt-in controls to prevent future opaque data practices in Firefox releases.

Sedlacep on Reddit’s r/firefox commented under 'Mozilla, Why?' noting that Mozilla’s nonprofit status did not absolve commercial motives, and that introducing Terms with ambiguous licensing suggested financial pressures. The commenter pointed out CEO compensation hypocrisy and urged transparency about revenue strategies, arguing that clearer disclosure about ads, partnerships, and optional features would rebuild confidence more than ambiguous legal wording that leaves users guessing what their inputs might be used for.

No-Razzmatazz7854 on Reddit’s r/firefox responded to 'Mozilla, Why?' noting skepticism about Mozilla's choices and urging users to examine CEO pay as evidence that nonprofit status can coexist with large executive compensation. The commenter suggested that financial incentives could drive strategic shifts toward revenue-generating features and called on Mozilla to publish clear, itemized funding plans and to communicate how optional AI features would operate without harvesting identifiable user inputs or metadata.