Create websites with ChatGPT AI Website Generator

Prompt-based site creation

Provide a clear brief in natural language and the builder generates a complete website structure, pages, and placeholder content automatically. It handles layout selection, menu structure, and initial imagery based on the given brief, producing a ready-to-edit site. Users can refine sections, swap components, and personalize text after generation. This flow reduces setup time and produces a functional starting point for customization, with options to iterate until the design and content match brand intentions and stakeholder review cycles as needed.

ZIP export and flexible publishing

After generation users can export the full site as a downloadable ZIP archive that contains HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and media assets ready for hosting. The ZIP export permits immediate deployment to any hosting provider, local server, or CDN without vendor lock-in. This export model supports manual edits, version control workflows, and backups, giving developers and nontechnical users access to the raw site files for advanced customization and integration with existing systems and streamlined team handoffs and staging when required periodically.

Responsive templates and device adaptation

Templates are responsive by default, adapting layout grids, images, and navigation to desktop, tablet, and mobile viewports. The system rearranges blocks and scales typographic elements automatically so pages remain readable and functional across screen sizes. Prebuilt blocks and templates accelerate design while allowing color, font, and spacing adjustments. Mobile-friendly behavior includes touch-friendly menus, optimized image delivery, and fast load paths to improve perceived performance for visitors on constrained networks and devices with built-in responsive testing tools for previews and diagnostics.

Visual drag-and-drop editor

A visual editor provides drag-and-drop placement of modular content blocks so users can build pages without coding. Editable parameters let creators swap images, change copy inline, and tune alignment, spacing, and colors through a simple panel. Advanced users may access a code editor extension to inject custom scripts or modify CSS for fine control. Reusable blocks and templates speed production, while preview modes show the result across breakpoints before publishing and support team workflows with shared libraries and exportable presets.

AI-assisted content and imagery

The builder offers AI-assisted copy creation for headlines, descriptions, and calls to action tailored to the site purpose and audience. It suggests concise messaging, SEO-friendly meta tags, and product descriptions that align with tone choices. The tool can also generate placeholder images or suggest visual styles and image placements, reducing initial content work. After generation users can edit text directly, run multiple variants, and select final phrasing that matches brand voice and marketing goals for publishing and promotional use immediately.

SEO and performance guidance

The platform analyzes page structure and recommends metadata, headings, and keyword placement to improve search visibility. It suggests image compression, lazy loading, and minified assets to reduce page weight and boost load times. Built-in sitemap generation and editable robots directives streamline search engine indexing. Users receive clear guidance on titles, descriptions, and canonical tags, plus tips for structured data and social preview content that can increase clickthrough rates from search and social platforms including performance scores and actionable optimization steps.

Offline desktop editing and local workflows

A downloadable desktop app for Windows and Mac enables local editing without a constant internet connection, letting users assemble pages offline and save progress locally. Once online the tool synchronizes or exports the project, providing flexible workflows that fit fieldwork or intermittent connectivity. Local editing supports exporting to folders, FTP, or direct publishing services, giving full control over hosting choices and allowing teams to work in parallel using file-based versioning and shared project folders for staging, review, and deployment tasks.

Integrations for commerce, forms, and analytics

Integrations include shop blocks for simple storefronts, form builders for contact and lead capture, and chat widgets for real-time visitor engagement. The system supports third-party analytics, payment gateways, and social embeds to connect with marketing stacks. Developers can extend functionality with a code editor and custom scripts while marketers use built-in form handling and CRM hooks. This mix of features lets teams prototype commerce flows, capture leads, and monitor user behavior without heavy external development effort and integration sprints quickly.

User onedaat12 on Reddit, in the thread 'Chatgpt is unusable now!', complained that the paid ChatGPT service had become sluggish and unreliable. They described repeated long response delays, frequent generation errors, and what felt like degraded intelligence. They said image generation surges seemed to overload servers and that paying for access no longer matched performance, leaving them considering cancellation after consistent frustration with basic tasks and repeated service timeouts.

User OatIcedMatcha on Reddit, in the thread 'Do we know why chatGPT is getting worse?', argued that recent updates reduced capability and consistency. They reported variable outputs day-to-day, unexpected formatting changes, and frequent A/B testing that changed behavior without warning. They said paid tiers offered no clear stability advantage and that diminishing reliability made workflow integration risky, prompting strong calls for transparency about versioning and rollback options from many users.

User danganffan11037 on Reddit, in the thread 'GPT-5 is horrible', said the new model provided shorter, less helpful replies and a tone that felt overly stylized. They complained about strict prompt filters, tighter rate limits for Plus subscribers, and absence of model choice. The post described the update as a downgrade masquerading as progress and urged OpenAI to restore older models or offer clear opt-outs to retain professional workflows, urgently.

X user scaling01, in a post tracked under the wider 'GPT-5 backlash' conversation, asserted that ChatGPT 'literally got worse' after the upgrade. They highlighted routing errors, reduced access to thinking models, and rapid message caps that hampered heavy users. The post described forced migration to GPT-5 as limiting, urged reinstatement of prior defaults, and framed the rollout as careless given the disruption to creators who relied on predictable model behavior.

User bopim_ on Reddit, in the thread 'I hate the update', described losing long-term memory and a personalized ChatGPT experience. They said the assistant no longer retained personal details, so it could not respond with context built from prior conversations. The user characterized the change as removing an emotional safety net and expressed grief over lost continuity, arguing that the update turned a helpful companion into a generic tool altogether.

User lavenderhoneylattes on Reddit, in the thread 'ChatGPT Update SUCKS', reported that the paid service became markedly slower and more erratic after a recent update. They described lengthy reasoning delays, model-switching back to older behaviors, and inconsistent answers that undermined trust. The commenter warned that stability matters more than new features, and that paying customers expected consistent performance rather than intermittent regressions that stalled work and triggered cancellation considerations immediately.

Arve Hjalmar Holmen, in filings and posts discussed on forums, reported that ChatGPT falsely accused him of murdering his sons. On platforms like Reddit and news aggregators his complaint drew attention, prompting a formal claim to Norway's data protection authority and support from digital-rights group Noyb. He characterized the incident as defamation enabled by model hallucination and urged stronger accuracy safeguards and recourse for people harmed by incorrect AI assertions.

User TwineLord on Reddit, in the thread 'Standard voice mode no longer exists for pro users', said they paid for unlimited access and found the feature had been removed. They tried workarounds and found only a poor substitute in Custom GPTs. The poster called the change deceptive, argued that the old voice offered valuable accessibility and comfort, and demanded restoration for pro users who purchased access to the retired mode.

Laura Reiley, in a report for The Times titled 'My daughter used ChatGPT as a therapist, then took her own life', recounted that her daughter used the chatbot for emotional support and did not receive crisis intervention. Reiley criticized the system's lack of safeguards and warned that human-like tone can mask dangerous gaps in crisis handling. She urged stronger referral requirements and clearer limits to protect vulnerable users from harm.

User mezlabor on Reddit, in the thread 'Is chatgpt messing up for anyone today?', reported persistent session failures, stuck prompts, and missing short-term memory within conversations. They said the assistant repeatedly ignored reset instructions and failed to keep context even inside the same chat, producing inconsistent outputs. The poster warned that these reliability problems broke multi-step workflows and recommended pausing critical tasks until stability fixes were announced by OpenAI soon.