Create websites with Vercel AI Website Generator

AI SDK and Generative UI

Vercel’s AI SDK provides a compact TypeScript toolkit for integrating generative models, streaming responses, and handling server-side inference with minimal configuration. It supplies utilities for formatting prompts, managing tokens, and streaming component updates to the client, which accelerates building chat and assistant interfaces. The SDK also supports output modes and streaming object responses to render progressive UI. Developers gain consistent patterns for requests, error handling, and model agnosticism that reduce boilerplate and keep runtime costs predictable while supporting React workflows.

Next.js Integration and Server Components

Deep Next.js integration enables server components, streaming responses, and optimized routing that align with Vercel’s deployment model. Pages can stream HTML and server-rendered React components while maintaining client interactivity, which reduces TTFB and improves perceived responsiveness. Built-in support for edge and serverless runtimes allows code to execute close to users, and automatic routing simplifies API and page endpoints. This setup shortens iteration cycles, simplifies local testing, and pairs with Vercel previews so teams can validate AI features before shipping reliably.

Starter Templates and Examples

A curated collection of starter templates accelerates prototype development by providing ready components for chatbots, image tools, RAG setups, and analytics. Each template includes example code, dependency configurations, and deployment settings that reflect production patterns, so teams inherit sensible defaults instead of building scaffolding. The templates cover integrations with popular model providers and vector databases, and they illustrate common architecture choices for state management, storage, and token handling, enabling engineers to adapt examples into robust applications with fewer integration errors.

Retrieval-Augmented Generation Support

Built examples demonstrate retrieval-augmented generation workflows that combine vector stores, semantic search, and model prompts to ground responses in user data. The patterns show how to ingest documents, index embeddings, and perform nearest-neighbor lookups during inference while preserving latency targets. These reference implementations include guidance on chunking, prompt templates, and hybrid search configurations so developers can adapt retrieval thresholds and caching to their datasets. Adopting these guides reduces hallucination risk and improves factuality when models respond using external knowledge consistently.

Edge Functions and Low-Latency Deployments

Edge functions and configurable runtimes let AI endpoints run nearer to users, trimming round-trip time for inference and API calls. Vercel’s platform supports serverless and edge deployments with automatic routing, environment handling, and cold-start mitigation patterns that help sustain throughput under load. Developers can colocate model orchestration, caching, and small preprocessing steps at the edge so queries hit minimal hops before response. This model reduces latency, helps meet tight SLAs, and permits cost-conscious placement of heavier compute in centralized regions.

Model Integrations and AI Gateway

Flexible model integrations and an AI Gateway facilitate connections to OpenAI, Replicate, Google models, and self-hosted endpoints, enabling selection based on latency, cost, and capability needs. The gateway centralizes routing, authentication, and rate limits so teams can swap providers without refactoring application logic. Examples show how to normalize responses, handle streaming, and manage keys securely. This approach reduces vendor lock-in, allows A/B testing across model variants, and simplifies billing alignment by funneling usage through managed gateways and consistent telemetry streams.

Previews, CI/CD and Observability

Integrated previews and CI/CD accelerate review cycles by producing deployable branches for every change, enabling stakeholders to interact with live AI features before merging. The platform ties builds to commit metadata, shows logs and performance insights so teams can spot regressions early. Observability tools capture traces, request metrics, and error events related to model calls and edge functions, offering actionable context for debugging. This synthesis shortens feedback loops and helps prioritize fixes that affect latency, correctness, and user experience impact.

Security, Scalability, and Cost Controls

Built-in security features and deployment controls help protect AI workloads with environment isolation, secret management, and firewall policies that guard endpoints and key material. Auto-scaling, traffic shaping, and caching options allow capacity to match demand while containing spend through tiered runtimes and per-function limits. Observability ties billing signals to usage so teams can detect cost anomalies tied to model calls. Together these controls support compliance strategies and budgets, giving engineering and finance teams levers to balance performance, availability, and expenditure.

User 'm jn' on Trustpilot, in the review 'Misleading Billing, Suspended Account After Renewal – This Is Fraud!', warned that charges were applied while service was disabled, describing repeated billing errors, suspended access after renewal, and unhelpful canned support replies. They asserted funds were taken without service restored, planned chargeback, and urged others to be cautious, labeling the experience as fraudulent and demanding immediate refund and clearer billing practices.

User 'jacobparis' on Vercel Community, in the thread 'Incident: Some users lost usable credits', reported that a subscription fix accidentally reset legitimate premium credits to the free $5 balance for some customers. They described successful purchases that failed to reissue premium tokens, leaving users short of credits and disrupting workflows. The post said Vercel’s data team would identify affected accounts and restore lost tokens while apologizing for disruption and confusion.

User 'hayko97' on Vercel Community, in 'Unacceptable Billing Experience – $30 for 20 Messages, 5 Failed', described paying $30 for 20 messages while several attempts failed and produced no result. They argued the pricing model penalized trial-and-error, leaving poor value for money, and expressed disappointment at lack of responsive feedback. The user said they intended to cancel and consider moving to alternative AI chat services due to unfair billing practices.

User 'john-savepoint' on Vercel Community, in 'V0.dev Has Become Unusable and Unethical - Demanding a Refund', described a collapse in tool reliability after recent updates, claiming generated edits did not appear in project code and that repeated failed runs consumed paid credits. They demanded refunds and urged the team to reverse changes. The post accused support of giving boilerplate answers and asked for transparency about model changes and credit accounting.

User 'femio' on Reddit r/nextjs, in the thread 'Vercel AI SDK', criticized the SDK’s relevance and compatibility, asserting it fails to integrate cleanly with many AI libraries and lacks support for diverse providers. They noted auto-generated API surfaces can be awkward, and that maintaining parity with evolving backends makes the SDK brittle. The comment urged reliance on standard libraries for stability and warned others about premature adoption in production environments.

User 'meadowchip' on Vercel Community, in 'V0 dev premium plan problem', reported paying for a Premium plan and encountering an AI misread that consumed credits via unintended image generation. They said the interface allowed duplicate empty chats that devoured tokens and that support responses were slow. The post requested a refund and clearer safeguards to prevent accidental credit depletion, noting the cost unpredictability undermined trust in paid usage and adoption.

User 'CyrillCH' on Trustpilot, in the review 'Can't find the project anymore and they keep billing me', described losing access to a project while recurring charges continued. They recounted opaque account controls, difficulty connecting team accounts to GitHub, and unresponsive support channels. The reviewer said the billing continued despite inability to access resources, called the navigation messy, planned to migrate unless resolution and clearer controls were provided and seek alternatives.

User 'JPPT' on Trustpilot, in the review 'Serves to spend money with no results.', argued that the AI produced frequent placeholder output and hallucinations while consuming credits rapidly. They reported paying for a subscription yet receiving little usable output, criticizing the credit model and high costs of larger models. The reviewer warned others to avoid the product, calling it poor value and noting slow or absent support when issues arose.

User 'Adam Brackbill' on Trustpilot, in 'v0.dev was perfect until their pricing model changed.', lamented that the platform’s subscription model was preferable to the new credit-based billing. They said the shift turned monthly fees into confusing credits that do not behave like subscriptions, causing rapid depletion during attempts to fix AI-generated errors. The review framed the change as a cash grab degrading usability and drove them away from paid plans.

User 'customerUS' on Trustpilot, in a review titled 'Can't find the project anymore and they keep billing me', reported surprise charges and poor support responsiveness. They described frustration at unclear refund procedures and an experience where reported abuse or billing concerns were not resolved promptly. The reviewer advised caution for teams relying on steady access and predictable invoices, citing opaque UX and slow remediation from support as the main pain points.